Preamble. Preamble is perhaps similar to stumble? If you should stumble across this preamble please note that all views / ideas expressed here (or THIS if you are a computer scientist - THIS refers to self in computer science) are mine and mine alone. Sadly I am frequently finding that indeed my ideas are mine alone and not readily understood by the wider public. Anyway to repeat, to re-iterate. All views expressed are mine. They may be wholly erroneous or I may have stumbled across something. If they are erroneous I accept no liability for them, express or implied and my liability will be limited to £1 should I be brought before an arbiter (A court where the process of arbitration occurs) for the passing of a judgement (Presumably against me). If however my hypothesis(es?) prove correct then I shall of course accept full acknowledgement of the fact that I am the embodiment of a living genius. (And who are you to claim otherwise?).

With that premable in mind I shall move swiftly on to the bit I want to amble about. (I don’t think amble is in the English language but if preamble is the precursor then amble should be next bit - that makes sense right?). Anyway, ambling on.

With metastatic cancer the cancer must have entered the blood right? If you identify cancer cells when they are at low levels or amplify/culture the blood (containing the cancer cells) to make them detectable you may be able to detect the cancer at an early stage. And if you treat the cancer at an early stage there may be a better prognosis (outcome).

Cancer occurs in older people so cancer must be a function of the ageing process. As the two phenomena are associated treating one must have an effect on the other. Delaying biological ageing must delay the onset of cancer. Conversely finding treatments for cancer must imply that we are creating life extending therapeutics ie slowing ageing / extending life.